Attorney General of Missouri — Opinion
June 8, 1976
JOHN C. DANFORTH, Attorney General
Dr. Arthur L. Mallory Commissioner of Education State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Jefferson State Office Building Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Dear Dr. Mallory:
In accordance with your request of April 26, 1976, we have reviewed the Missouri State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education’s “Title I, ESEA, Annual Program Plan, Fiscal Year Ending September 30, 1977.” This application for federal funds is being submitted under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, P.L. 89-10, as amended.
In addition to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended, and the regulations propounded pursuant thereto (45 C.F.R. 116, October 1, 1975 edition), our review has taken into consideration Article III, Section 38(a), Missouri Constitution, and Section 161.092, RSMo 1973 Supp.
Based on the foregoing, we hereby certify that the Missouri State Department of Elementary and Secondary Education has authority under state law to perform the duties and functions of a state educational agency under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended, and the regulations propounded pursuant thereto, including those arising from the assurances set forth in the application.
In addition to this opinion letter which constitutes our official certification, we have executed the form of certification attached to the Annual Program Plan.
Very truly yours,
JOHN C. DANFORTH Attorney General
815 P.2d 1150 HAZEL HOWARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARIE DALIO, Defendant and Appellant. No.…
348 Mont. 80, 201 P.3d 8 KIM J. KAFKA and CINDY R. KAFKA, Individually and…
Marriage of Webb. No. DA 06-0633.Supreme Court of Montana. December 5, 2007. Appeal from the…
87 P.2d 183 STATE EX REL. GRIFFITH, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF SHELBY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.…
356 Mont. 190, 232 P.3d 385 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PATRICK DEAN…
859 P.2d 1015 CITY OF GREAT FALLS, MONTANA, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.…