OPINION NO. 118-84 (1984)

The Honorable James C. Kirkpatrick

Attorney General of Missouri — Opinion
September 10, 1984

The Honorable James C. Kirkpatrick Secretary of State State Capitol Building Jefferson City, Missouri 65101

JOHN ASHCROFT

Dear Mr. Kirkpatrick:

In response to your letter of September 5, 1984, and pursuant to Section 116.160.2, RSMo Supp. 1983, we have prepared the following ballot title for a statutory measure proposed by the initiative:

Permits charging consumers for certain costs of electrical plants abandoned due to lack of approved waste disposal or other causes; requires certain rate increase deferrals; prohibits certain costs overrun, excess capacity and nuclear plant charges.

Very truly yours,

JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 118-84

Recent Posts

HOWARD v. DALIO, 249 Mont. 316 (1991)

815 P.2d 1150 HAZEL HOWARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARIE DALIO, Defendant and Appellant. No.…

8 years ago

KAFKA v. THE MONTANA DEPT., 2008 MT 460

348 Mont. 80, 201 P.3d 8 KIM J. KAFKA and CINDY R. KAFKA, Individually and…

8 years ago

IN RE WEBB, 340 Mont. 380 (2007)

Marriage of Webb. No. DA 06-0633.Supreme Court of Montana. December 5, 2007. Appeal from the…

8 years ago

STATE EX REL. GRIFFITH v. CITY OF SHELBY, 107 Mont. 571 (1939)

87 P.2d 183 STATE EX REL. GRIFFITH, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF SHELBY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.…

8 years ago

STATE v. BROWNBACK, 2010 MT 96

356 Mont. 190, 232 P.3d 385 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PATRICK DEAN…

8 years ago

CITY OF GREAT FALLS v. TEMPLE BAPTIST, 260 Mont. 319 (1993)

859 P.2d 1015 CITY OF GREAT FALLS, MONTANA, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.…

8 years ago