OPINION NO. 178-79 (1979)

Mr. F. M. Wilson, Director

Attorney General of Missouri — Opinion
October 18, 1979

LIQUOR: If an individual is convicted of supplying intoxicating liquor to a minor, there is no violation of § 311.060 RSMo or Regulation 11 CSR 70-2.140(13).

Mr. F. M. Wilson, Director Department of Public Safety 621 East Capitol Avenue Jefferson City, Missouri 65101

John Ashcroft

Dear Mr. Wilson:

This opinion is issued in response to your request for a ruling on the following question:

If an individual is convicted (pursuant to Section 311.310, RSMo, 1978) of supplying intoxicating liquor to a minor, is he/she disqualified from holding a liquor license pursuant to Section 311.060, RSMo 1978, and disqualified from employment pursuant to Regulation 11 CSR 70-2.140 (13)?

Section 311.060 RSMo 1978 provides in pertinent part:

. . . no person shall be granted a license or permit hereunder . . . who has been convicted . . . of a violation of the provisions of any law applicable to the manufacture or sale of intoxicating liquor.

Regulation 11 CSR 70-2.140(13) provides in pertinent part:

No licensee shall employ on or about the licensed premises any person who has been convicted . . . of a violation of the provisions of any law applicable to the manufacture or sale of intoxicating liquor.

Both of these prohibitions are founded on a conviction for “the manufacture or sale” of intoxicating liquor. Contra-distinctively, your question concerns a conviction for supplying intoxicating liquor to a minor. A conviction for the supply of intoxicating liquor to a minor is distinct from a conviction for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor.

CONCLUSION

It is the opinion of this office that, if an individual is convicted of supplying intoxicating liquor to a minor, there is no violation of § 311.060 RSMo or Regulation 11 CSR 70-2.140(13).

The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by my Assistant, James R. Cumbee.

Sincerely,

JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

HOWARD v. DALIO, 249 Mont. 316 (1991)

815 P.2d 1150 HAZEL HOWARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARIE DALIO, Defendant and Appellant. No.…

8 years ago

KAFKA v. THE MONTANA DEPT., 2008 MT 460

348 Mont. 80, 201 P.3d 8 KIM J. KAFKA and CINDY R. KAFKA, Individually and…

8 years ago

IN RE WEBB, 340 Mont. 380 (2007)

Marriage of Webb. No. DA 06-0633.Supreme Court of Montana. December 5, 2007. Appeal from the…

8 years ago

STATE EX REL. GRIFFITH v. CITY OF SHELBY, 107 Mont. 571 (1939)

87 P.2d 183 STATE EX REL. GRIFFITH, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF SHELBY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.…

8 years ago

STATE v. BROWNBACK, 2010 MT 96

356 Mont. 190, 232 P.3d 385 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PATRICK DEAN…

8 years ago

CITY OF GREAT FALLS v. TEMPLE BAPTIST, 260 Mont. 319 (1993)

859 P.2d 1015 CITY OF GREAT FALLS, MONTANA, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.…

8 years ago