Attorney General of Missouri — Opinion
June 7, 2010
Page 1
Topics:
Ballots. Initiative and Referendum. Referendum.
Summary conclusion:
Review and approval of the legal content and form of the fiscal note summary for Senate Substitute for Senate Committee Substitute for House Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 1764 for a referendum to repeal and enact sections relating to insurance.
The Honorable Susan Montee Missouri State Auditor State Capitol, Room 121 Jefferson City, MO 65101
CHRIS KOSTER, Attorney General
Dear Auditor Montee:
This office received your letter of June 7, 2010, submitting a fiscal note and fiscal note summary prepared under §§ 116.170 and 116.175, RSMo. The fiscal note summary that you submitted is as follows:
It is estimated this proposal will have no immediate costs or savings to state or local governmental entities. However, because of the uncertain interaction of the proposal with implementation of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, future costs to state governmental entities are unknown.
Under § 116.175, we approve the legal content and form of the fiscal note summary. Because our review of the fiscal note summary is mandated by statute, no action that we take with respect to such review should be construed as an endorsement of the petition or as the expression of any view regarding the objectives of its proponents.
Very truly yours,
_________________ Chris Koster Attorney General
815 P.2d 1150 HAZEL HOWARD, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARIE DALIO, Defendant and Appellant. No.…
348 Mont. 80, 201 P.3d 8 KIM J. KAFKA and CINDY R. KAFKA, Individually and…
Marriage of Webb. No. DA 06-0633.Supreme Court of Montana. December 5, 2007. Appeal from the…
87 P.2d 183 STATE EX REL. GRIFFITH, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF SHELBY ET AL., RESPONDENTS.…
356 Mont. 190, 232 P.3d 385 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. PATRICK DEAN…
859 P.2d 1015 CITY OF GREAT FALLS, MONTANA, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent, v.…